Name:
Adduct:
Polarity:
Z:
m/z:
±:
CCS: Å2
±: %
SMI:
Type:

Make a CSV file containing information about your queries.
Then upload the CSV file below and click on "Make Queries" to view the results online
and click "Download Results" to download the entire results in one excel file.
An example of the CSV file can be found below

Download Example CSV


**Make sure the header column names are as follows**

...



Upload a CSV file

1
May, J. C. et al. Conformational Ordering of Biomolecules in the Gas Phase: Nitrogen Collision Cross Sections Measured on a Prototype High Resolution Drift Tube Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 86, 2107–2116 (2014).


2
Paglia, G. et al. Ion Mobility Derived Collision Cross Sections to Support Metabolomics Applications. Anal. Chem. 86, 3985–3993 (2014).


3
Groessl, M., Graf, S. & Knochenmuss, R. High resolution ion mobility-mass spectrometry for separation and identification of isomeric lipids. Analyst 140, 6904–6911 (2015).


4
Zhou, Z., Shen, X., Tu, J. & Zhu, Z.-J. Large-Scale Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Metabolites in Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 88, 11084–11091 (2016).


5
Hines, K. M., Herron, J. & Xu, L. Assessment of altered lipid homeostasis by HILIC-ion mobility-mass spectrometry-based lipidomics. The Journal of Lipid Research 58, 809–819 (2017).


6
Bijlsma, L. et al. Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Small Molecules: Application to Pesticide Residue Analysis. Anal. Chem. 89, 6583–6589 (2017).


7
Hines, K. M., Ross, D. H., Davidson, K. L., Bush, M. F. & Xu, L. Large-Scale Structural Characterization of Drug and Drug-Like Compounds by High-Throughput Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 89, 9023–9030 (2017).


8
Stow, S. M. et al. An Interlaboratory Evaluation of Drift Tube Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry Collision Cross Section Measurements. Anal. Chem. 89, 9048–9055 (2017).


9
Zhou, Z., Tu, J., Xiong, X., Shen, X. & Zhu, Z.-J. LipidCCS: Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Lipids with High Precision To Support Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry-Based Lipidomics. Anal. Chem. 89, 9559–9566 (2017).


10
Zheng, X. et al. A structural examination and collision cross section database for over 500 metabolites and xenobiotics using drift tube ion mobility spectrometry. Chem. Sci. 8, 7724–7736 (2017).


11
Hines, K. M. et al. Characterization of the Mechanisms of Daptomycin Resistance among Gram-Positive Bacterial Pathogens by Multidimensional Lipidomics. mSphere 2, 99–16 (2017).


12
Lian, R. et al. Ion mobility derived collision cross section as an additional measure to support the rapid analysis of abused drugs and toxic compounds using electrospray ion mobility time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Methods 10, 749–756 (2018).


13
Mollerup, C. B., Mardal, M., Dalsgaard, P. W., Linnet, K. & Barron, L. P. Prediction of collision cross section and retention time for broad scope screening in gradient reversed-phase liquid chromatography-ion mobility-high resolution accurate mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A 1542, 82–88 (2018).


14
Righetti, L. et al. Ion mobility-derived collision cross section database: Application to mycotoxin analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta 1014, 50–57 (2018).


15
Tejada-Casado, C. et al. Collision cross section (CCS) as a complementary parameter to characterize human and veterinary drugs. Analytica Chimica Acta 1043, 52–63 (2018).


16
Nichols, C. M. et al. Untargeted Molecular Discovery in Primary Metabolism: Collision Cross Section as a Molecular Descriptor in Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90, 14484–14492 (2018).


17
Hines, K. M. & Xu, L. Lipidomic consequences of phospholipid synthesis defects in Escherichia coli revealed by HILIC-ion mobility-mass spectrometry. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids 219, 15–22 (2019).


18
Leaptrot, K. L., May, J. C., Dodds, J. N. & McLean, J. A. Ion mobility conformational lipid atlas for high confidence lipidomics. Nature Communications 1–9 (2019).


19
Blaženović, I. et al. Increasing Compound Identification Rates in Untargeted Lipidomics Research with Liquid Chromatography Drift Time–Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90, 10758–10764 (2018).


20
Vasilopoulou, C. G. et al. Trapped ion mobility spectrometry and PASEF enable in-depth lipidomics from minimal sample amounts. Nature Communications 1–11 (2020).


21
Tsugawa, H. et al. MS-DIAL 4: accelerating lipidomics using an MS/MS, CCS, and retention time atlas. bioRxiv 37, 513 (2020).


22
Poland, J. C. et al. Collision Cross Section Conformational Analyses of Bile Acids via Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 31, 1625–1631 (2020).


23
Dodds, J. et al. Rapid Characterization of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) by Ion Mobility Spectrometry−Mass Spectrometry (IMS-MS). Anal. Chem. 92, 4427-4435 (2020).


24
Celma, A. et al. Improving Target and Suspect Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflows in Environmental Analysis by Ion Mobility Separation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 15120-15131 (2020)


25
Belova, L. et al. Ion Mobility-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (IM-HRMS) for the Analysis of Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs): Database Compilation and Application to Urine Samples. Anal. Chem. XXX, XXXX-XXXX (2021)


26
Ross, D. H., et al. High-Throughput Measurement and Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Collision Cross Sections for Drugs and Drug Metabolites. J Am Soc Mass Spectr 33, 1061–1072 (2022).


ID Name Adduct Structure m/z CCS SMI Type Z Ref CCS Type CCS method
CCSBASE_85B0B98F33 Cer(38:0) [M+HCOO]- 640.588 265.2 [C@](CO)([H])(NC(CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC)=O)[C@]([H])(O)CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC lipid 1 9 DT single field, calibrated with Agilent tune mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_27CF72C142 Cer(38:1) [M+HCOO]- 638.5724 263.4 [C@](CO)([H])(NC(CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC)=O)[C@]([H])(O)CC=CCCCCCCCCCCCC lipid 1 9 DT single field, calibrated with Agilent tune mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_8B24764789 Cer(40:0) [M-H]- 622.6138 262.1 [C@](CO)([H])(NC(CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC)=O)[C@]([H])(O)CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC lipid 1 9 DT single field, calibrated with Agilent tune mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_E66AC50109 Cer(40:0) [M+HCOO]- 668.6193 272.0 [C@](CO)([H])(NC(CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC)=O)[C@]([H])(O)CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC lipid 1 9 DT single field, calibrated with Agilent tune mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_452B795B85 Cer(40:1) [M+HCOO]- 666.6037 269.4 [C@](CO)([H])(NC(CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC)=O)[C@]([H])(O)CC=CCCCCCCCCCCCC lipid 1 9 DT single field, calibrated with Agilent tune mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_DC1277694E Cer(40:2) [M-H]- 618.5825 259.8 [C@](CO)([H])(NC(CC=CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC)=O)[C@]([H])(O)CC=CCCCCCCCCCCCC lipid 1 9 DT single field, calibrated with Agilent tune mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_C778908C80 Cer(42:1) [M-H]- 648.6295 267.7 [C@](CO)([H])(NC(CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC)=O)[C@]([H])(O)CC=CCCCCCCCCCCCC lipid 1 9 DT single field, calibrated with Agilent tune mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_FBAC2A8663 Cer(42:2) [M-H]- 646.6138 266.1 [C@](CO)([H])(NC(CC=CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC)=O)[C@]([H])(O)CC=CCCCCCCCCCCCC lipid 1 9 DT single field, calibrated with Agilent tune mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_E50025F569 Cer(42:2) [M+HCOO]- 692.6193 274.4 [C@](CO)([H])(NC(CC=CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC)=O)[C@]([H])(O)CC=CCCCCCCCCCCCC lipid 1 9 DT single field, calibrated with Agilent tune mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_9C364FA3C5 GlcCer(36:1) [M+HCOO]- 772.5939 283.3 [C@](CO[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)C(O)C1O)([H])(NC(CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC)=O)[C@]([H])(O)CC=CCCCCCCCCCCCC lipid 1 9 DT single field, calibrated with Agilent tune mix (Agilent)
1 2 ... 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 ... 1698 1699