Name:
Adduct:
Polarity:
Z:
m/z:
±:
CCS: Å
±: %
SMI:
Type:

Make a CSV file containing information about your queries.
Then upload the CSV file below and click on "Make Queries" to view the results online
and click "Download Results" to download the entire results in one excel file.
An example of the CSV file can be found below

Download Example CSV


**Make sure the header column names are as follows**

...



Upload a CSV file

1
May, J. C. et al. Conformational Ordering of Biomolecules in the Gas Phase: Nitrogen Collision Cross Sections Measured on a Prototype High Resolution Drift Tube Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 86, 2107–2116 (2014).


2
Paglia, G. et al. Ion Mobility Derived Collision Cross Sections to Support Metabolomics Applications. Anal. Chem. 86, 3985–3993 (2014).


3
Groessl, M., Graf, S. & Knochenmuss, R. High resolution ion mobility-mass spectrometry for separation and identification of isomeric lipids. Analyst 140, 6904–6911 (2015).


4
Zhou, Z., Shen, X., Tu, J. & Zhu, Z.-J. Large-Scale Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Metabolites in Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 88, 11084–11091 (2016).


5
Hines, K. M., Herron, J. & Xu, L. Assessment of altered lipid homeostasis by HILIC-ion mobility-mass spectrometry-based lipidomics. The Journal of Lipid Research 58, 809–819 (2017).


6
Bijlsma, L. et al. Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Small Molecules: Application to Pesticide Residue Analysis. Anal. Chem. 89, 6583–6589 (2017).


7
Hines, K. M., Ross, D. H., Davidson, K. L., Bush, M. F. & Xu, L. Large-Scale Structural Characterization of Drug and Drug-Like Compounds by High-Throughput Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 89, 9023–9030 (2017).


8
Stow, S. M. et al. An Interlaboratory Evaluation of Drift Tube Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry Collision Cross Section Measurements. Anal. Chem. 89, 9048–9055 (2017).


9
Zhou, Z., Tu, J., Xiong, X., Shen, X. & Zhu, Z.-J. LipidCCS: Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Lipids with High Precision To Support Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry-Based Lipidomics. Anal. Chem. 89, 9559–9566 (2017).


10
Zheng, X. et al. A structural examination and collision cross section database for over 500 metabolites and xenobiotics using drift tube ion mobility spectrometry. Chem. Sci. 8, 7724–7736 (2017).


11
Hines, K. M. et al. Characterization of the Mechanisms of Daptomycin Resistance among Gram-Positive Bacterial Pathogens by Multidimensional Lipidomics. mSphere 2, 99–16 (2017).


12
Lian, R. et al. Ion mobility derived collision cross section as an additional measure to support the rapid analysis of abused drugs and toxic compounds using electrospray ion mobility time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Methods 10, 749–756 (2018).


13
Mollerup, C. B., Mardal, M., Dalsgaard, P. W., Linnet, K. & Barron, L. P. Prediction of collision cross section and retention time for broad scope screening in gradient reversed-phase liquid chromatography-ion mobility-high resolution accurate mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A 1542, 82–88 (2018).


14
Righetti, L. et al. Ion mobility-derived collision cross section database: Application to mycotoxin analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta 1014, 50–57 (2018).


15
Tejada-Casado, C. et al. Collision cross section (CCS) as a complementary parameter to characterize human and veterinary drugs. Analytica Chimica Acta 1043, 52–63 (2018).


16
Nichols, C. M. et al. Untargeted Molecular Discovery in Primary Metabolism: Collision Cross Section as a Molecular Descriptor in Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90, 14484–14492 (2018).


17
Hines, K. M. & Xu, L. Lipidomic consequences of phospholipid synthesis defects in Escherichia coli revealed by HILIC-ion mobility-mass spectrometry. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids 219, 15–22 (2019).


18
Leaptrot, K. L., May, J. C., Dodds, J. N. & McLean, J. A. Ion mobility conformational lipid atlas for high confidence lipidomics. Nature Communications 1–9 (2019).


19
Blaženović, I. et al. Increasing Compound Identification Rates in Untargeted Lipidomics Research with Liquid Chromatography Drift Time–Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90, 10758–10764 (2018).


20
Tsugawa, H. et al. MS-DIAL 4: accelerating lipidomics using an MS/MS, CCS, and retention time atlas. bioRxiv 37, 513 (2020).


21
Poland, J. C. et al. Collision Cross Section Conformational Analyses of Bile Acids via Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 31, 1625–1631 (2020).


22
Dodds, J. et al. Rapid Characterization of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) by Ion Mobility Spectrometry−Mass Spectrometry (IMS-MS). Anal. Chem. 92, 4427-4435 (2020).


23
Celma, A. et al. Improving Target and Suspect Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflows in Environmental Analysis by Ion Mobility Separation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 15120-15131 (2020)


24
Belova, L. et al. Ion Mobility-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (IM-HRMS) for the Analysis of Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs): Database Compilation and Application to Urine Samples. Anal. Chem. XXX, XXXX-XXXX (2021)


25
Ross, D. H., et al. High-Throughput Measurement and Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Collision Cross Sections for Drugs and Drug Metabolites. J Am Soc Mass Spectr 33, 1061–1072 (2022).


26
EH Palm, J Engelhardt, S Tshepelevitsh, J Weiss, A Kruve (2024) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom DOI:10.1021/jasms.4c00035


27
Baker, E. S. et al. METLIN-CCS Lipid Database: An authentic standards resource for lipid classification and identification Nat. Metab. 6, 981-982 (2024).


28
HB Muller, G Scholl, J Far, E de Pauw, G Eppe (2023) Anal Chem 95(48): 17586-17594


29
Coming Soon...


ID Name Adduct Structure m/z CCS SMI Type Z Ref CCS Type CCS method
CCSBASE_7944ca449be3d0c7b76a6c9e3636bc1b 16:0 SM (d18:1/16:0) [M+Cl]- 737.536946 283.94 None None -1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_9b5a464b0f4cbceed7c87e907a75f0bb 16:0 SM (d18:1/16:0) [M+HCOO]- 747.5657476 287.24 None None -1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_0ea79b914adba1f1982c778b2738e7c9 16:0 stigmasteryl glucose [M+Na]+ 835.6421902 319.4 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_133fa2b74ed607ebda777eb4c6430597 16:0 stigmasteryl glucose [M+NH4]+ 830.6867936 321.633333333 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_97914fefd1a1838c5025fd96ab20c73f 16:0 stigmasteryl glucose [M+HCOO]- 857.651173 327.666666667 None None -1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_25f0a642afb3765415af77c112bd525f 16:0-(12-PAHSA) DG [M+Na]+ 873.7517346 319.166666667 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_189a8cf7c6dd41b6e8ade2f2de7df020 16:0-(12-PAHSA) DG [M+H]+ 851.76979067 320.766666667 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_1c43d0bb6b5bbc0ea20bdc99a78dcd8a 16:0-(12-PAHSA) DG [M+NH4]+ 868.796338 320.3 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_bff848d7c700e58538d9fc2bde03766a 16:0-(12-PAHSA) DG [M+Cl]- 885.7319158 320.033333333 None None -1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_840a4ca9f9865a7d03bc1310d044e422 16:0-(12-PAHSA) PC [M+Na]+ 1038.8072118 342.966666667 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
1 2 ... 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 ... 2315 2316