Name:
Adduct:
Polarity:
Z:
m/z:
±:
CCS: Å
±: %
SMI:
Type:

Make a CSV file containing information about your queries.
Then upload the CSV file below and click on "Make Queries" to view the results online
and click "Download Results" to download the entire results in one excel file.
An example of the CSV file can be found below

Download Example CSV


**Make sure the header column names are as follows**

...



Upload a CSV file

1
May, J. C. et al. Conformational Ordering of Biomolecules in the Gas Phase: Nitrogen Collision Cross Sections Measured on a Prototype High Resolution Drift Tube Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 86, 2107–2116 (2014).


2
Paglia, G. et al. Ion Mobility Derived Collision Cross Sections to Support Metabolomics Applications. Anal. Chem. 86, 3985–3993 (2014).


3
Groessl, M., Graf, S. & Knochenmuss, R. High resolution ion mobility-mass spectrometry for separation and identification of isomeric lipids. Analyst 140, 6904–6911 (2015).


4
Zhou, Z., Shen, X., Tu, J. & Zhu, Z.-J. Large-Scale Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Metabolites in Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 88, 11084–11091 (2016).


5
Hines, K. M., Herron, J. & Xu, L. Assessment of altered lipid homeostasis by HILIC-ion mobility-mass spectrometry-based lipidomics. The Journal of Lipid Research 58, 809–819 (2017).


6
Bijlsma, L. et al. Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Small Molecules: Application to Pesticide Residue Analysis. Anal. Chem. 89, 6583–6589 (2017).


7
Hines, K. M., Ross, D. H., Davidson, K. L., Bush, M. F. & Xu, L. Large-Scale Structural Characterization of Drug and Drug-Like Compounds by High-Throughput Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 89, 9023–9030 (2017).


8
Stow, S. M. et al. An Interlaboratory Evaluation of Drift Tube Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry Collision Cross Section Measurements. Anal. Chem. 89, 9048–9055 (2017).


9
Zhou, Z., Tu, J., Xiong, X., Shen, X. & Zhu, Z.-J. LipidCCS: Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Lipids with High Precision To Support Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry-Based Lipidomics. Anal. Chem. 89, 9559–9566 (2017).


10
Zheng, X. et al. A structural examination and collision cross section database for over 500 metabolites and xenobiotics using drift tube ion mobility spectrometry. Chem. Sci. 8, 7724–7736 (2017).


11
Hines, K. M. et al. Characterization of the Mechanisms of Daptomycin Resistance among Gram-Positive Bacterial Pathogens by Multidimensional Lipidomics. mSphere 2, 99–16 (2017).


12
Lian, R. et al. Ion mobility derived collision cross section as an additional measure to support the rapid analysis of abused drugs and toxic compounds using electrospray ion mobility time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Methods 10, 749–756 (2018).


13
Mollerup, C. B., Mardal, M., Dalsgaard, P. W., Linnet, K. & Barron, L. P. Prediction of collision cross section and retention time for broad scope screening in gradient reversed-phase liquid chromatography-ion mobility-high resolution accurate mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A 1542, 82–88 (2018).


14
Righetti, L. et al. Ion mobility-derived collision cross section database: Application to mycotoxin analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta 1014, 50–57 (2018).


15
Tejada-Casado, C. et al. Collision cross section (CCS) as a complementary parameter to characterize human and veterinary drugs. Analytica Chimica Acta 1043, 52–63 (2018).


16
Nichols, C. M. et al. Untargeted Molecular Discovery in Primary Metabolism: Collision Cross Section as a Molecular Descriptor in Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90, 14484–14492 (2018).


17
Hines, K. M. & Xu, L. Lipidomic consequences of phospholipid synthesis defects in Escherichia coli revealed by HILIC-ion mobility-mass spectrometry. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids 219, 15–22 (2019).


18
Leaptrot, K. L., May, J. C., Dodds, J. N. & McLean, J. A. Ion mobility conformational lipid atlas for high confidence lipidomics. Nature Communications 1–9 (2019).


19
Blaženović, I. et al. Increasing Compound Identification Rates in Untargeted Lipidomics Research with Liquid Chromatography Drift Time–Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90, 10758–10764 (2018).


20
Tsugawa, H. et al. MS-DIAL 4: accelerating lipidomics using an MS/MS, CCS, and retention time atlas. bioRxiv 37, 513 (2020).


21
Poland, J. C. et al. Collision Cross Section Conformational Analyses of Bile Acids via Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 31, 1625–1631 (2020).


22
Dodds, J. et al. Rapid Characterization of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) by Ion Mobility Spectrometry−Mass Spectrometry (IMS-MS). Anal. Chem. 92, 4427-4435 (2020).


23
Celma, A. et al. Improving Target and Suspect Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflows in Environmental Analysis by Ion Mobility Separation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 15120-15131 (2020)


24
Belova, L. et al. Ion Mobility-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (IM-HRMS) for the Analysis of Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs): Database Compilation and Application to Urine Samples. Anal. Chem. XXX, XXXX-XXXX (2021)


25
Ross, D. H., et al. High-Throughput Measurement and Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Collision Cross Sections for Drugs and Drug Metabolites. J Am Soc Mass Spectr 33, 1061–1072 (2022).


26
EH Palm, J Engelhardt, S Tshepelevitsh, J Weiss, A Kruve (2024) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom DOI:10.1021/jasms.4c00035


27
Baker, E. S. et al. METLIN-CCS Lipid Database: An authentic standards resource for lipid classification and identification Nat. Metab. 6, 981-982 (2024).


28
HB Muller, G Scholl, J Far, E de Pauw, G Eppe (2023) Anal Chem 95(48): 17586-17594


29
Coming Soon...


ID Name Adduct Structure m/z CCS SMI Type Z Ref CCS Type CCS method
CCSBASE_6cae55158635ddc02b8821fdf3ae1ad3 18:1 Monomethyl PE [M-H]- 756.554849 276.666666667 CCCCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(=O)([O-])OCC[NH2+]C)OC(=O)CCCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCC Lipids and lipid-like molecules -1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_d540987ceae19b98e582854fa574e12e 18:1 PC [M+Na]+ 808.5826438 295.4 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_625157867a492d8f61d40616f53d972a 18:1 PC [M+H]+ 786.6006994 292.4 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_84d54834a5b3fe667f059ad08fae2877 18:1 PC [M+HCOO]- 830.5916266 297.82 None None -1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_0345c7fe945981bfde0e07d59410f2cf 18:1 PDP PE [M+Na]+ 963.5326014 313.3 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_93bca9f679ac141e16b6e05eb732ab04 18:1 PDP PE [M+H]+ 941.55065747 311.6 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_175170d90fd6d1af4f411e59efdc254e 18:1 PDP PE [M-H]- 939.536105 310.2 None None -1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_4d086214db24c7713303f652b1e5b56d PE(18:1(9Z)/18:1(9Z)) [M+Na]+ 766.5356962 285.633333333 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_9012981b06609ea5043240e74145ccb6 PE(18:1(9Z)/18:1(9Z)) [M+H]+ 744.55375227 279.866666667 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_c56a1a52bf7463bd25e2361adfd65968 PE(18:1(9Z)/18:1(9Z)) [M-H]- 742.5391998 273.933333333 None None -1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
1 2 ... 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 ... 2315 2316