Name:
Adduct:
Polarity:
Z:
m/z:
±:
CCS: Å
±: %
SMI:
Type:

Make a CSV file containing information about your queries.
Then upload the CSV file below and click on "Make Queries" to view the results online
and click "Download Results" to download the entire results in one excel file.
An example of the CSV file can be found below

Download Example CSV


**Make sure the header column names are as follows**

...



Upload a CSV file

1
May, J. C. et al. Conformational Ordering of Biomolecules in the Gas Phase: Nitrogen Collision Cross Sections Measured on a Prototype High Resolution Drift Tube Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 86, 2107–2116 (2014).


2
Paglia, G. et al. Ion Mobility Derived Collision Cross Sections to Support Metabolomics Applications. Anal. Chem. 86, 3985–3993 (2014).


3
Groessl, M., Graf, S. & Knochenmuss, R. High resolution ion mobility-mass spectrometry for separation and identification of isomeric lipids. Analyst 140, 6904–6911 (2015).


4
Zhou, Z., Shen, X., Tu, J. & Zhu, Z.-J. Large-Scale Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Metabolites in Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 88, 11084–11091 (2016).


5
Hines, K. M., Herron, J. & Xu, L. Assessment of altered lipid homeostasis by HILIC-ion mobility-mass spectrometry-based lipidomics. The Journal of Lipid Research 58, 809–819 (2017).


6
Bijlsma, L. et al. Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Small Molecules: Application to Pesticide Residue Analysis. Anal. Chem. 89, 6583–6589 (2017).


7
Hines, K. M., Ross, D. H., Davidson, K. L., Bush, M. F. & Xu, L. Large-Scale Structural Characterization of Drug and Drug-Like Compounds by High-Throughput Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 89, 9023–9030 (2017).


8
Stow, S. M. et al. An Interlaboratory Evaluation of Drift Tube Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry Collision Cross Section Measurements. Anal. Chem. 89, 9048–9055 (2017).


9
Zhou, Z., Tu, J., Xiong, X., Shen, X. & Zhu, Z.-J. LipidCCS: Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Lipids with High Precision To Support Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry-Based Lipidomics. Anal. Chem. 89, 9559–9566 (2017).


10
Zheng, X. et al. A structural examination and collision cross section database for over 500 metabolites and xenobiotics using drift tube ion mobility spectrometry. Chem. Sci. 8, 7724–7736 (2017).


11
Hines, K. M. et al. Characterization of the Mechanisms of Daptomycin Resistance among Gram-Positive Bacterial Pathogens by Multidimensional Lipidomics. mSphere 2, 99–16 (2017).


12
Lian, R. et al. Ion mobility derived collision cross section as an additional measure to support the rapid analysis of abused drugs and toxic compounds using electrospray ion mobility time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Methods 10, 749–756 (2018).


13
Mollerup, C. B., Mardal, M., Dalsgaard, P. W., Linnet, K. & Barron, L. P. Prediction of collision cross section and retention time for broad scope screening in gradient reversed-phase liquid chromatography-ion mobility-high resolution accurate mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A 1542, 82–88 (2018).


14
Righetti, L. et al. Ion mobility-derived collision cross section database: Application to mycotoxin analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta 1014, 50–57 (2018).


15
Tejada-Casado, C. et al. Collision cross section (CCS) as a complementary parameter to characterize human and veterinary drugs. Analytica Chimica Acta 1043, 52–63 (2018).


16
Nichols, C. M. et al. Untargeted Molecular Discovery in Primary Metabolism: Collision Cross Section as a Molecular Descriptor in Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90, 14484–14492 (2018).


17
Hines, K. M. & Xu, L. Lipidomic consequences of phospholipid synthesis defects in Escherichia coli revealed by HILIC-ion mobility-mass spectrometry. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids 219, 15–22 (2019).


18
Leaptrot, K. L., May, J. C., Dodds, J. N. & McLean, J. A. Ion mobility conformational lipid atlas for high confidence lipidomics. Nature Communications 1–9 (2019).


19
Blaženović, I. et al. Increasing Compound Identification Rates in Untargeted Lipidomics Research with Liquid Chromatography Drift Time–Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90, 10758–10764 (2018).


20
Tsugawa, H. et al. MS-DIAL 4: accelerating lipidomics using an MS/MS, CCS, and retention time atlas. bioRxiv 37, 513 (2020).


21
Poland, J. C. et al. Collision Cross Section Conformational Analyses of Bile Acids via Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 31, 1625–1631 (2020).


22
Dodds, J. et al. Rapid Characterization of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) by Ion Mobility Spectrometry−Mass Spectrometry (IMS-MS). Anal. Chem. 92, 4427-4435 (2020).


23
Celma, A. et al. Improving Target and Suspect Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflows in Environmental Analysis by Ion Mobility Separation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 15120-15131 (2020)


24
Belova, L. et al. Ion Mobility-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (IM-HRMS) for the Analysis of Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs): Database Compilation and Application to Urine Samples. Anal. Chem. XXX, XXXX-XXXX (2021)


25
Ross, D. H., et al. High-Throughput Measurement and Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Collision Cross Sections for Drugs and Drug Metabolites. J Am Soc Mass Spectr 33, 1061–1072 (2022).


26
EH Palm, J Engelhardt, S Tshepelevitsh, J Weiss, A Kruve (2024) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom DOI:10.1021/jasms.4c00035


27
Baker, E. S. et al. METLIN-CCS Lipid Database: An authentic standards resource for lipid classification and identification Nat. Metab. 6, 981-982 (2024).


28
HB Muller, G Scholl, J Far, E de Pauw, G Eppe (2023) Anal Chem 95(48): 17586-17594


29
Coming Soon...


ID Name Adduct Structure m/z CCS SMI Type Z Ref CCS Type CCS method
CCSBASE_9d0a23900b76ef46fcdb64652deb80e8 18:1 propargyl PC [M+H]+ 810.60069987 296.433333333 CCCCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(=O)([O-])OCC[N+](C)(C)CC#C)OC(=O)CCCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCC None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_dcadcfc784ec5851d13d86246ebaff18 18:1 propargyl PC [M+HCOO]- 854.5916266 301.166666667 CCCCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(=O)([O-])OCC[N+](C)(C)CC#C)OC(=O)CCCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCC None -1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_8387d91b35b36881aea368ed6930950d 18:1 PS (DOPS) [M+Na]+ 810.5255262 288.266666667 CCCCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(=O)(O)OC[C@@H](C(=O)O)N)OC(=O)CCCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCC Lipids and lipid-like molecules 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_8dc2ae11d936c993781b1fa27820e168 18:1 PS (DOPS) [M+H]+ 788.54358227 286.166666667 CCCCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(=O)(O)OC[C@@H](C(=O)O)N)OC(=O)CCCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCC Lipids and lipid-like molecules 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_ac5b1c5b4ed96492cfe8f7c56f0fd50f 18:1 PS (DOPS) [M-H]- 786.5290298 283.866666667 CCCCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(=O)(O)OC[C@@H](C(=O)O)N)OC(=O)CCCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCC Lipids and lipid-like molecules -1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_c6a60a0a925efbaf88dd98ccd9cc1f46 18:1 Ptd Ethylene Glycol [M+H]+ 745.53776867 286.866666667 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_af9eb2f27a12d7f30ce899d036a84eee 18:1 Ptd Ethylene Glycol [M+NH4]+ 762.564316 286.9 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_76373722619438967ed7383602321217 18:1 Ptd Ethylene Glycol [M-H]- 743.5232162 274.8 None None -1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_62e10d2397ee75f975aa63bca0a72ad6 18:1 SM (d18:1/18:1(9Z)) [M+Na]+ 751.572414 288.066666667 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_43829a7948dee7bcd9cc8dd5b72aead9 18:1 SM (d18:1/18:1(9Z)) [M+H]+ 729.59047007 288.666666667 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
1 2 ... 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 ... 2315 2316