Name:
Adduct:
Polarity:
Z:
m/z:
±:
CCS: Å
±: %
SMI:
Type:

Make a CSV file containing information about your queries.
Then upload the CSV file below and click on "Make Queries" to view the results online
and click "Download Results" to download the entire results in one excel file.
An example of the CSV file can be found below

Download Example CSV


**Make sure the header column names are as follows**

...



Upload a CSV file

1
May, J. C. et al. Conformational Ordering of Biomolecules in the Gas Phase: Nitrogen Collision Cross Sections Measured on a Prototype High Resolution Drift Tube Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 86, 2107–2116 (2014).


2
Paglia, G. et al. Ion Mobility Derived Collision Cross Sections to Support Metabolomics Applications. Anal. Chem. 86, 3985–3993 (2014).


3
Groessl, M., Graf, S. & Knochenmuss, R. High resolution ion mobility-mass spectrometry for separation and identification of isomeric lipids. Analyst 140, 6904–6911 (2015).


4
Zhou, Z., Shen, X., Tu, J. & Zhu, Z.-J. Large-Scale Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Metabolites in Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 88, 11084–11091 (2016).


5
Hines, K. M., Herron, J. & Xu, L. Assessment of altered lipid homeostasis by HILIC-ion mobility-mass spectrometry-based lipidomics. The Journal of Lipid Research 58, 809–819 (2017).


6
Bijlsma, L. et al. Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Small Molecules: Application to Pesticide Residue Analysis. Anal. Chem. 89, 6583–6589 (2017).


7
Hines, K. M., Ross, D. H., Davidson, K. L., Bush, M. F. & Xu, L. Large-Scale Structural Characterization of Drug and Drug-Like Compounds by High-Throughput Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 89, 9023–9030 (2017).


8
Stow, S. M. et al. An Interlaboratory Evaluation of Drift Tube Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry Collision Cross Section Measurements. Anal. Chem. 89, 9048–9055 (2017).


9
Zhou, Z., Tu, J., Xiong, X., Shen, X. & Zhu, Z.-J. LipidCCS: Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Lipids with High Precision To Support Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry-Based Lipidomics. Anal. Chem. 89, 9559–9566 (2017).


10
Zheng, X. et al. A structural examination and collision cross section database for over 500 metabolites and xenobiotics using drift tube ion mobility spectrometry. Chem. Sci. 8, 7724–7736 (2017).


11
Hines, K. M. et al. Characterization of the Mechanisms of Daptomycin Resistance among Gram-Positive Bacterial Pathogens by Multidimensional Lipidomics. mSphere 2, 99–16 (2017).


12
Lian, R. et al. Ion mobility derived collision cross section as an additional measure to support the rapid analysis of abused drugs and toxic compounds using electrospray ion mobility time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Methods 10, 749–756 (2018).


13
Mollerup, C. B., Mardal, M., Dalsgaard, P. W., Linnet, K. & Barron, L. P. Prediction of collision cross section and retention time for broad scope screening in gradient reversed-phase liquid chromatography-ion mobility-high resolution accurate mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A 1542, 82–88 (2018).


14
Righetti, L. et al. Ion mobility-derived collision cross section database: Application to mycotoxin analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta 1014, 50–57 (2018).


15
Tejada-Casado, C. et al. Collision cross section (CCS) as a complementary parameter to characterize human and veterinary drugs. Analytica Chimica Acta 1043, 52–63 (2018).


16
Nichols, C. M. et al. Untargeted Molecular Discovery in Primary Metabolism: Collision Cross Section as a Molecular Descriptor in Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90, 14484–14492 (2018).


17
Hines, K. M. & Xu, L. Lipidomic consequences of phospholipid synthesis defects in Escherichia coli revealed by HILIC-ion mobility-mass spectrometry. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids 219, 15–22 (2019).


18
Leaptrot, K. L., May, J. C., Dodds, J. N. & McLean, J. A. Ion mobility conformational lipid atlas for high confidence lipidomics. Nature Communications 1–9 (2019).


19
Blaženović, I. et al. Increasing Compound Identification Rates in Untargeted Lipidomics Research with Liquid Chromatography Drift Time–Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90, 10758–10764 (2018).


20
Tsugawa, H. et al. MS-DIAL 4: accelerating lipidomics using an MS/MS, CCS, and retention time atlas. bioRxiv 37, 513 (2020).


21
Poland, J. C. et al. Collision Cross Section Conformational Analyses of Bile Acids via Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 31, 1625–1631 (2020).


22
Dodds, J. et al. Rapid Characterization of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) by Ion Mobility Spectrometry−Mass Spectrometry (IMS-MS). Anal. Chem. 92, 4427-4435 (2020).


23
Celma, A. et al. Improving Target and Suspect Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflows in Environmental Analysis by Ion Mobility Separation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 15120-15131 (2020)


24
Belova, L. et al. Ion Mobility-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (IM-HRMS) for the Analysis of Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs): Database Compilation and Application to Urine Samples. Anal. Chem. XXX, XXXX-XXXX (2021)


25
Ross, D. H., et al. High-Throughput Measurement and Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Collision Cross Sections for Drugs and Drug Metabolites. J Am Soc Mass Spectr 33, 1061–1072 (2022).


26
EH Palm, J Engelhardt, S Tshepelevitsh, J Weiss, A Kruve (2024) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom DOI:10.1021/jasms.4c00035


27
Baker, E. S. et al. METLIN-CCS Lipid Database: An authentic standards resource for lipid classification and identification Nat. Metab. 6, 981-982 (2024).


28
HB Muller, G Scholl, J Far, E de Pauw, G Eppe (2023) Anal Chem 95(48): 17586-17594


29
Coming Soon...


ID Name Adduct Structure m/z CCS SMI Type Z Ref CCS Type CCS method
CCSBASE_452b489ecdb19ba82204a3340e329dfc 18:1 (?9-Cis) PC (DOPC) [M+HCOO]- 830.5916266 297.8 None None -1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_fbfe23716bf2f5d0d4edbd8188348734 18:1 (delta6-Cis) PC [M+Na]+ 808.5826438 298.43 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_ec989f544d6f4fba6d2270279ffe206f 18:1 (delta6-Cis) PC [M+H]+ 786.60069987 295.03 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_fba4a6f963dceaba1128036ee4feb321 18:1 (delta6-Cis) PC [M+HCOO]- 830.5916266 298.833333333 None None -1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_c0b87b7e8cf792e0880dca3eeff0afb7 18:1 (delta9-Cis) PG [M+H]+ 775.54833287 290.066666667 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_b31e86afca6f7785ac558b065fc49faa 18:1 (delta9-Cis) PG [M+NH4]+ 792.5748802 290.266666667 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_eade284876ddac2d4f6f9a5e55e7d3bc 18:1 (delta9-Cis) PG [M-H]- 773.5337804 280.833333333 None None -1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_d7f361b0e5f2d3781a983f75acba9dbc 18:1 (delta9-Cis) PG [M+HCOO]- 819.5392596 298.333333333 None None -1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_e6d7add78e2ad668aecf0bdbcb852388 PC(18:1(9E)/18:1(9E)) [M+Na]+ 808.5826438 296.533333333 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
CCSBASE_e4fe457674bc3effb0ae37cddb1f5f7d PC(18:1(9E)/18:1(9E)) [M+H]+ 786.60069987 293.733333333 None None 1 27 TIMS calibrated with ESI Low Concentration Tuning Mix (Agilent)
1 2 ... 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 ... 2315 2316